Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
Compare and contrast the two novels as visions of a future that has gone dramatically wrong. Brave New World and were both written by men who had experienced war on the grand scale of the twentieth century. Disillusioned and alarmed by what they saw in society, each author produced a powerful satire and an alarming vision of future possibilities.
Although the two books are very different, they address many of the same issues in their contrasting ways. Human beings and the goods they make are tailored to one another: The society presented in is less comfortably balanced.
The population is kept content with a rather meagre lot because of the constant war, which, as is explicitly stated in the Book, is a convenient means of maintaining the status quo, and the Party keeps a very close watch on those members of society who are deemed capable of disrupting it.
Orwell posits a certain level of technological advance—the two-way television screens and the ever-present surveillance equipment, the novel-writing machines, but not much else.
His purpose was not to imagine the details of such technologies, but to present the use to which they are put. Huxley goes considerably further in imagining scientific advance. In his World State, humans are engendered and grown in artificial wombs. However, the idea of automation seems to have passed him by, so that people are grown for the purposes of toiling in factories or operating elevators.
Again, however, the author is not attempting to present a detailed picture of what life would be like in the far distant future; he is showing the effects of such things on human nature.
For both authors, a necessary action in their future societies is the abolition of the past. Thus the richness of human history is cast aside.
The rejection of history takes a more aggressive form inwhere it becomes impossible to understand the past, because the details of the past are constantly rewritten to conform with the requirements of the present. The concept of historical truth is irrelevant: Winston Smith himself takes part in this, rewriting the news: Just as history is effectively abolished in both societies, so is the family.
Huxley extrapolates the trend for elective childbearing until it becomes grotesque: Children are taught from their earliest years to give their loyalty to the Party and to Big Brother, and are encouraged to spy on and betray their own parents.
Thus the family becomes one more means of surveillance, so that everyone is surrounded by people who cannot be trusted.
The reader can only be thankful Huxley does not go into details. In Brave New World, sexual intercourse is completely separate from reproduction. Along with the family unit, exclusive partnerships have been abolished.
Naturally, this sort of behaviour is incomprehensible to The Savage, who has been brought up on the edges of a quite different society—and in a close relationship with his mother, to boot. The consequence of such absolute promiscuity is that sex becomes a mindless and meaningless act of no more significance than eating a bar of chocolate.
In Oceania, sex is treated in a quite opposite manner.George Orwell’s dystopian classic, ',' is back in vogue—but to understand what's happening in our world, we need less Big Brother and more Aldous Huxley. Feb 13, · There exists a comfortably predictable and, to my mind, uninspired approach to the dystopic novel and its powers of prognosis, a Pavlovian response that involves reaching for a copy of George Orwell’s “” or Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” whenever extreme turbulence hits .
Both by George Orwell and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World are startling depictions of such a society. Although these novels are of fictional worlds, control of the future may be subtly evolving and becoming far worse than Huxley or Orwell could ever have imagined.
Utopia, the future society depicted in Huxley's Brave New World, is more universal and more relevant to modern society than 's Big Brother. While both Utopia and Big Brother are equally plausible versions of a future society, the two were brought into existence by different preceding events.
The covers of these editions of Orwell's , left, and Huxley's Brave New World, use similar imagery 'Whether in actual fact the policy of the boot-on-the-face can go on indefinitely seems doubtful.
Brave New World is a dystopian novel, which extrapolated from the rise of technology, science, and totalitarianism in the s to imagine a future totalitarian state in which humanity had been robbed of all free choice and were forced into happiness through the manipulation of genetics and psychology.